🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy produced results, and revealed new appeals had been made by mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in certain ways if talks restart.

Trump recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi stated the 12-day war revealed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the attacks began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary answer to resolve disputes, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to break. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this assault."